Man, some of this stuff is interesting. I've been reading quite a few cables tonight. Here's a small taste of one in particular released last night. It concerns EU ambassadors attending Ahmadinejad's inauguration:
Quote:
Classified By: Political Minister-Counselor Kathleen H. Allegrone, for
reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
¶1. (C/NF) European Union members will send low-ranking
diplomats to the first of two inauguration ceremonies for
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, but they will not inform the Iranians of
their plans, according to French MFA Acting Middle East
Director (Assistant-Secretary equivalent) Jean-Christophe
Paucelle.
¶2. (C/NF) All EU members will, however, send their
Ambassadors to the August 5 inauguration ceremony in the
Iranian Parliament. Paucelle adopted a defensive tone when
explaining this decision, which he said was finalized in
Brussels the morning of July 31. He admitted this issue had
generated tense and fractious debate among European foreign
ministers. "We are caught between two conflicting
objectives," Paucelle explained. "On the one hand, we want
to communicate that we do not approve of this illegitimate
election. On the other hand, we need to be realistic: the
power is in the hands of Khameini and Ahmadinejad, including
the nuclear file, and we must negotiate with those in power.
You are in the same position." Paucelle insisted that the EU
will continue to respect what he described as "the Durban red
lines." "We will walk right out if Ahmadinejad denies the
Holocaust or declares that his regime will destroy Israel."
(NOTE: Paucelle admitted that since non-Muslims had never
before received an invitation to the inauguration ceremony
presided over by the Supreme Leader, EU diplomats in Tehran
have never entered the building where the event will take
place, and so they are not sure how they will stage their
walk-out, logistically, should they need to do so. They are
worried that the doors may be locked. END NOTE.)
[ . . . ]
"The Iranians are desperate for
recognition and so they have disregarded their usual devotion
to protocol -- and their anti-British vitriol -- on this
occasion."
¶3. (C/NF) Paucelle said that the case of detained French
citizen Clothilde Reiss has also influenced the EU decision
to attend the inauguration ceremonies. "We think she may be
released soon, and we don't want to create another irritant,"
Paucelle said. "There are enough already."
[ . . . ]
He added that, of course,
she may not be released at all next week, but the French
remain optimistic that she will soon be out of prison.
PEKALA
|
Oh noes, they'll walk out if Mr. Ahmedinejad mentions what everyone knows he is already thinking. And I don't think attending his inauguration ceremony is really showing disapproval of his "illegitimate" election.
http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/cable...PARIS1046.html