She argues that looking at arguments put forward by Christian apologetics, most are at odds with that fact that Christianity failed to do the right thing time after time in history. And now apologetics use outcomes that might have nothing do with the influence of religion through history to prove their point.
She argues that looking at arguments put forward by Christian apologetics, most are at odds with that fact that Christianity failed to do the right thing time after time in history. And now apologetics use outcomes that might have nothing do with the influence of religion through history to prove their point.
The article that ''oilyfan'' posted a link to(written by a man) does not understand history. The ''Dark Ages" were a Crown/Cathollic phenomenon. The first person to translate the Bible into english was burned at the stake by the Vatican. Look up "John Dee" to begin to understand how contemptuous the Royals are of Christianity.
Carl fking Sagan would be doing barrel rolls in his grave at the state of today's discourse
Carl fking Sagan was a cheap celebrity hack who never did anything original. He should have been be buried at the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
Problem with a guy like Dinesh D'Souza is that he's skilled mainly on rhetoric and is not really an official religious nor scholarly authority in any capacity.
You're absolutely right, Dinesh D'Souza is skilled mainly on rhetoric and is not really an official religious nor scholarly authority in any capacity. He should gain 50 pounds, become an obsene drunk and start writing for Vanity Fair. I just hope he doesn't get cancer.
|