Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post - 'Intactivists' to San Francisco: Ban circumcision

Thor · 11-20-2010, 07:50 AM

I'm against them, you lose some sexual pleasure later from these procedures and most parents that still do this today, especially in the USA do it for aesthetic reasons and because it was done to them when they were young.

Its odd how if you ask people who are for male circumcisions what they think about the same being done for girls they are usually loudly against that.

How it 'looks' is not a valid reason for doing this to an infant, if you let the boy decide when he's an adult then go for it but to force an infant to go through this procedure which has with it some serious risks is unnecessary.

11-20-2010, 07:50 AM	#40
Thor God of Hating Twitter Join Date: Apr 2006 Exp:	I'm against them, you lose some sexual pleasure later from these procedures and most parents that still do this today, especially in the USA do it for aesthetic reasons and because it was done to them when they were young. Its odd how if you ask people who are for male circumcisions what they think about the same being done for girls they are usually loudly against that. How it 'looks' is not a valid reason for doing this to an infant, if you let the boy decide when he's an adult then go for it but to force an infant to go through this procedure which has with it some serious risks is unnecessary. __________________ Allskonar fyrir Aumingja!!