I think the aids thing is a pointless argument. Even if it's true, it's really only useful in an aids ridden area where a large number of the population are infected. In north america I'd say circumcised guys and not circumcised guys have an equal chance at getting hiv/aids.
The hygiene thing is sort of valid. I mean if you don't wash your junk regularly you probably will get a little funkier down there then someone who's circumcised. But honestly like mentioned if you have access to water and a bar of irish spring this shouldn't be an issue.
The only other thing I can think of is the 'looks' thing. Everyones heard that chicks think foreskins are gross, or that circumcised wieners look "nicer". Might be the case down in the US, but I gotta think up here any guy born in the mid-late '80s or later when it really started to become unpopular has a pretty good shot at being un-snipped so lots of ladies out there have likely seen their fair share and are more accustomed to it.
Quote:
|
Circumcision takes away the circumcisee's right to personal choice. It's an irreversable decision that the child is stuck with for the rest of his life.
|
pretty sure if you don't know any better you won't care too much. LOL. and it's not like there is anything
wrong with being circumcised, necessarily so it's not like they're missin out on something major and completely life altering.