View Single Post
Old 10-31-2010, 09:06 PM   #73
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
But there is only so much capacity in the lots. When they were free there was a supply shortage. So charging a fee makes sense. At sommerset Bridlewood the lot fills up at about 8:30. So no more incentive is required and the $3 fee is either the right amount or possibly a little low.

At anderson whcih doesn't fill up anymore the fee is obviously too high and should be lowered or eliminated. At the Anderson lot I would agree the fee discourages use.

The price needs to be assessed on a lot by lot basis the same way downtown parking is priced. Let the market decide the correct price for the product and make sure it is fully utilized.
At one time IIRC they charged a fee for those wishing to have a reserved spot at some lots.

If you lower fees at one lot transit users will flock to that cheaper lot. Just like those that will park aways from the lots to avoid the $3 fee.
__________________
Dion is offline