View Single Post
Old 10-31-2010, 09:03 PM   #70
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
Both are looking for revenue. Charging a fee for parking only discourages transit use - I call it negitive re enforecement. Creative some incentives to get people to use public transit.

But there is only so much capacity in the lots. When they were free there was a supply shortage. So charging a fee makes sense. At sommerset Bridlewood the lot fills up at about 8:30. So no more incentive is required and the $3 fee is either the right amount or possibly a little low.

At anderson whcih doesn't fill up anymore the fee is obviously too high and should be lowered or eliminated. At the Anderson lot I would agree the fee discourages use.

The price needs to be assessed on a lot by lot basis the same way downtown parking is priced. Let the market decide the correct price for the product and make sure it is fully utilized.
GGG is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: