[CaptainCrunch]

I guess my big dissapointment is the misunderstanding of the debate. The Truther movement is built around theory and long reaching without much more then speculation and really bad science to back it up. They bring out the experts, but these experts are shakey at the best, or really unrelated at the worst. ( I remember the aeropace expert that was marched out on the pentagon wreckage that was found who was emphatic that it didn't match the plane that should have hit the Pentagon, but in the end the guy worked in the marketing department).

The question that Truthers need to ask is, if you were a lawyer, would you be comfortable arguing your case in a court of law, would you be comfortable with your witnesses being cross examined.

Just by going by the continual remodifications of Loose Change, Alex Jones backing off of the thermite theory, I would think that the substantative answer would probably be no.