A Google search shows that Gage has in fact had debates, which is more than not once. If you can't even get that kind of fact right, why in the world should anyone trust your judgment with respect to something far more complicated like a collapsing building?
And of course debates aren't actually useful for determining if something is correct or not, they're just good at deciding who the better debater is.
That's why science is done through peer review and scientific journals, not debates.
And of course it's amusing that you
use underlines and "scary quotes" to try and make it seem like Gage is important because no one will "debate"
him, while at the same time don't use the same
emphasis to draw attention to the
criticisms of Gage's works, by other
truthers even.
Of course maybe he's responded since I last paid attention to this stuff. But he might just be a hyperspace alien too.