Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
You are good at math photon, but this entire post is garbage.
You know when a collapse happens, the falling material tends to take the path of least resistance. The floors beneath the impact point sure didn't put up much resistance, judging by the near free-fall speed of the collapse. The WTC7 collapse was confirmed (even by NIST) to be at free fall speed for 3.5-4 seconds. This is only possible if all support members below the impact point are taken out simultaneously.
Also, you don't find the symmetry of the "collapses" the least bit suspicious?
I'm not sure a "collapse" can laterally eject massive beams (weighing in the hundreds of tons) with such force as to embed them into neighboring buildings.
There are actual engineers/architects (Ron Avery, Richard Gage) that can break down this "collapse" for you, not that you will bother putting the time in to review it.
..and at the end of the day there was molten metal found in the rubble weeks after the event. This cannot be explained. Something has to produce the kind of heat to make that happen.
I just cannot believe people can look at the collapse of Building 7 and convince themselves that was the result of some magical combination of fire and some minor asymmetrical debris damage at ground level.
|
Jesus christ. I don't even know what to say.
The physical happenings can easily be proven by simple maths. Stick with the motives/failure of intelligence angle. At least then we can't prove you wrong (other than using reason and logic).