Quote:
Originally Posted by Burninator
I think everyone agrees that there are holes in the official story. But the holes are small are do not discredit the story or put it into question at all. In fact to put them side by side and dismiss them both like you have done is giving the conspiracy theory way, way, way, way too much credit. I think what you have said is logical fallacy. Claiming both sides are extremes therefore they are both false.
The official story is like a fully reinforced dam with a pin prick or two, where the conspiracy theory is like throwing a handful of pebbles into a raging river.
|
I think it's not really fair to say there is one conspiracy theory. Obviously the demolition stuff is ludicrous, as is the something other than a plane hitting the pentagon. But that doesn't mean that the official story is correct either.
The events on 9/11 are probably correctly reported as the set up to fake it are, for the large part, impossible. However, that doesn't make US involvement through funding or other means implausible. Maybe other evidence does, I don't know. Obviously the burden of proof is on the accusers in this case.