Quote:
Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck
The collapse of WTC Building 7 was what really grabbed my curiosity.
You have a building that had relatively minor debris damage one on corner of the building and fires spread over roughly 7 floors.....then the whole thing takes the path of most resistance in virtual free-fall speed into it's own footprint......my common sense tells me something is not right.
Then you got all this confirmed thermite explosive flakes found in many WTC dust samples, and the dust itself had the by-products of a thermite reaction taking place and the pools of witness-confirmed molten steel under the rubble....folks only an incindiery of some kind can produce the extreme temperatures to produce molten iron...
|
I'm not going to bother with the collapse thing and how badly the building was damaged, etc. If you have read actual engineering reports and were not convinced, I'm not going to be able to convince you. If you haven't done your research properly, you won't read what I say anyway.
The thermite theory is interesting though... I'm assuming you're referring to barium nitrate being found.
Quote:
|
Presence of barium nitrate, the supposed smoking gun of the thermite theory, is indicative of either thermite-induced demolition or burning of computer circuit boards. I can't imagine where a bunch of burned computers would come from in an office building that was on fire.
|