Quote:
Originally Posted by Essembi
This is a very good point. In hindsight the intelligence that was available certainly seems compelling, however no one on 9/10 would have had the slightest expectation that something of this magnitude could have been possible, warning signs or not.
|
There have been multiple stories of the executive arm of any government ignoring solid intelligence, not because allowing the event to happen would enhance a political endgame, but because the intelligence is either too good, or simply because whats coming is almost unheard of.
The American's had several warnings of an attack on a U.S. Naval asset, but figured that nobody would be stupid enough to attack a U.S. War Ship. Yet the U.S.S. Cole was attacked by a bunch of guys in a rubber dingy.
9/11 Airplanes flying into major U.S. Cities, go back and get more information or confirmation because this is unlikely.
There has been an ongoing war between the U.S. intelligence services and the executive branch since Kennedy sold out the CIA in Cuba, there is no trust.