[CaptainCrunch]

Ok, not to come out in Barb's defense or anything.

But they can't say that she should differentiate between a group of volunteers and this interviewer. They set it up, they're responsible for this guys antics.

His questions weren't insightful or even smart, they were designed to do nothing but represent a candidate in a negative light. If he did that to all them fine, but I would expect that future Candidates won't be catering to that group.

There's no way that Higgin's should apologize or back down, they don't represent her voting block at all, and no matter what her performance would have been I doubt that she would have changed one vote in that group.

While I might be voting for Nenshi, I'm getting a little sick of the thickness that things are getting laid on. There's such a thing as over exposure, and the old question remains, if its too good to be true?

I'm starting to get flashbacks to Obama's campaign where it was long on scripting but upon election he was short on execution.