Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
Ah so it's maintenance of the staus quo that makes this okay. So I assume you're against the right of women to vote, after all that was a step to fix an injustice that was present in the legal/rights system at a certain point in time.
I would love, but don't actually expect, a response to the question of what exactly is lost by allowing counsel to be present at the questioning phase. What's the harm? Anyone? Bueller?
|
Wow, the personel attacks keep getting weaker and weaker. Now I am against the right of women to vote? Where do you guys come up with this stuff!
I would answer any question, why don't you expect one? My record on this site has always to respond, I rarely get responses back from my questions.
What is lost by allowing counsel to be present at the questioning phase? Well right now they are not allowed, and since I think police need more tools to lock people up and catch the criminals, than I think anything that makes their job harder should not be done. And before the attacks start, I mean harder as in things that inhibit them from doing their job. If not having a lawyer present makes it easier to interogate, than I am all for it.