Well from what I gather the NESV thing is a done deal, and the court case is about the legitimacy of Purslow and Ayres being members of the board(causing a 3-2 vote for the sale) against Hicks JR and his financial advisor or whatever which would cause a 4-1 vote against the sale).
Lim is saying that NESV cut a deal with RBS to pay off some or all of the 40MP deal, that he didn't get the opportunity to(which he says he would have paid).
This just allows Hicks to say there is a better option on the table for RBS and himself.
|