View Single Post
Old 09-06-2004, 12:13 PM   #60
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

How about getting back to the jest of the whole post and that being America's right to intervene in the internal affairs of another country without the support of the World Court and cooperation of the UN? How about trying to defend these actions? How do they differ from what the Nazi's and Soviets were crucified for in the past?

So....now you are saying the US had no right to go into Iraq because the "world court" (whatever the hell that means) and the UN didnt support them? Are you suggesting your tune would be one single bit different if the UN had given the nod of agreement? What about the 50+ countries that DID agree and still have troops over there? Are they also tools of the big bad Satan known as the USA and part of this massive conspiracy you continue to drone on about?

If the answer to the above questions is yes...OK...fair enough....but what right did Hussein have to invade Iran...or Kuwait....did he ask those world bodies if it was ok to lob missiles at Israel? Did he receive permission from the UN to gas his own people with WMD? Did Hussein get a yes from the "world court" to pay suicide bombers families that were successful in blowing the smithereens out of busses full of innocent women and children in Israel? Just curious.

Now if you want to compare the US actions to those ones...we can talk.

As for what the differance is between the Soviets running rough shod through the iron curtain and other places and what the Nazi's were doing, compared to the US action in Iraq, I have a simple answer. The US isnt there to take over the country, they went in and removed a dangerous dictator whom reigned terror over an entire region that was unable to fight back....in fact the US have already seceded power to the Iraqi people, something the Soviets nor the Nazis EVER did.

I have another question for you. Even IF Bush is re-elected and continues this vast right wing conspiracy you claim he is on, what happens in 4 years when he HAS to step down? Or are you suggesting that somehow he will repeal the US constitution and plant himself as supreme leader and therefor wont have to follow the law? If that happens...wouldnt you want him removed by force if need be? And if thats the case...isnt that EXACTLY what the US just did in Iraq??

Good lord Lanny...you are so twisted up inside this fabricated conspiracy theory of yours that you have lost all semblance of credibility. You are so biased and willing to believe everything you WANT to believe and ignore everything you DONT want to believe, that is placed right before your eyes. If its not what jives with your story...then its all because the media (ALL OF IT) is some government controlled entity...yet you use a whole bunch of media links to try and backup your outlandish claims!! Which way is it man?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote