View Single Post
Old 09-27-2010, 09:30 PM   #17
Ashartus
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redforever View Post
And even if the someone gets little relief from the procedure, why is the procedure not available to them? I can't see that it is in anyone's best interest to have a blockage in their body that gets ignored by the medical profession. This is no different than anyone with any other malady who is seeking treatment for that malady. Suppose someone has a very bad back, or is seeking treatment for cancer. Even if they get an operation or treatment, 100% assurance of success is never given. BUT, at least that patient has the option of choosing or rejecting procedures or treatments outlined to them.
The difference is that any cancer treatment that is funded by the health system will have undergone clinical trials to demonstrate that it has a net beneficial effect. Treatments that haven't gone through these clinical trials, no matter how promising, are not funded by the health system. That doesn't remove the option of choosing such a procedure (any more than it removes the option of going for the Liberation surgery), but the health system doesn't pay for it.
Ashartus is offline   Reply With Quote