Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city
Even if 10,000 people a day used the Peace Bridge it would still only be 1% of the city population. An overpass is still better bang for the buck if 25% of the city uses it.
|
I'd wager to say that it would be much less than that percentage that uses those interchanges. I was being generous and giving you the benefit of the doubt.
Besides, I'd also wager to say that given the associated mainentance, repair and environmental costs of isolated-use interchanges, and the associated residual financial benefits that a bridge like this can provide, the Peace Bridge is a better investment.