Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
McIver rails against the $25 million dollar bridge, but supports the unsustainable, low density growth patterns that require new infrastructure that gets paid for by the city. If you want someone who will solve the spending issue, you need to look elsewhere.
|
At best thats a complicated issue most people don't understand an no one has successfully made 'real' yet because it's conceptual money in future.
If candidates think think this is about bridges and sprawl I think they are doomed to fail (at least this election). Bridges are a focal point. Monthly bills are what people care about. Solving for notional capital billions over decades doesn't do a darn thing about operational excess today.