Well in theory the journalist would take a highly technical piece of writing like a paper and mash it up so it's digestible to the public.. in practice they're awful at this, sometimes because they're trying to fit it with a political (or ideological) frame, and also maybe because it seems the profession doesn't really encourage a journalist to take their time and digest and understand something before relaying it to the unwashed masses. Understanding science is hard sometimes.
EDIT: Either way it still has a chilling effect on the scientific enterprise which depends on openness and free discourse.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
|