According to this, Alnoor Kassam asked local immigration lawyers Sharma Harsanyi to review his admissibility hearing from about 8 years ago:
http://immlawyer.blogs.com/my_weblog...n-inquiry.html
The author reviews some of the adjudicator's findings and quotes from the decision:
Quote:
Therefore, after considering the credible evidence before me, I find, based on the balance of probabilities, there has been no linkage established between Kassam's acts or omissions and the elements of the offence involving making documents without authority in Kenya.
233. Accordingly, as it has not been established by the Minister's officials that Kassam committed, based on the balance of probabilities, an act or omission that would constitute an offence in Kenya, there is no need to compare Kassam's conduct to the elements of the Canadian offences
|
Note that this is the same firm that represented Jackie Tran zealously in the past couple years.
I bring this up simply to note that this seems like an odd way to counter negative PR about past dealings.