View Single Post
Old 09-02-2010, 08:35 AM   #7
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed View Post
Those three acts of terrorism in Canada were not designed to directly harm people, just their property. As far as I know, they were all branded as acts of terrorism. I would say the problem is just how we use the word terrorism in our every day language, we just make the word more serious when it directly involves harming innocent people.

Regardless, those are excellent points and I would say they do amount to racism in one form or another.
Huh, acts of terrorism are acts of terrorism no matter if people are there are not.

The guy blowing up pipelines in Western Canada is a terrorist. The people firebombing the recruiting center is a terrorist.

Its the use of violence to terrorize. destroying property with a bomb or a molotov cocktail even if no-one is around is still terrorism and shows a capability to escalate those acts.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CaptainCrunch For This Useful Post: