View Single Post
Old 08-28-2010, 04:04 PM   #30
Raekwon
First Line Centre
 
Raekwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Airdrie, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Devils'Advocate View Post
I dunno. Because the law states that they should not lose out on anything based on being pregnant?

Why is it that men bitch and moan that they are not treated equally in family court when it is the women that actually carry the child for 9 months and go through the trials and tribulations of pregnancy and giving birth? I think that if we're going to play the "sucks to be you game", it should balance out elsewhere.
It actually states:

not less than the earnings and other benefits that had accrued to
the employee
when the maternity or parental leave started.

So they were not entitled to more becuase the sharing was based on what they earned prior to mat leave.
Raekwon is offline   Reply With Quote