Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

MJM · 08-28-2010, 01:49 PM

WHat's wrong with that? She didn't work, didn't contribute to the bottom line, and it wasn't possible for them to evaluate her performance in that particular year. I think your expectations for maternity leave are a little skewed. I highly doubt there would any legislation against what the company did. They've met all their obligations. If she likes her job and there's future for potential career growth within it, you may want to leave it be. Can't see a company looking to kindly at that considering they just covered her mat leave.

You'd probably have a case if there was another person in similar circumstances who got race. But if not, why rock the boat?

08-28-2010, 01:49 PM	#4
MJM Lifetime Suspension Join Date: Aug 2008 Exp:	WHat's wrong with that? She didn't work, didn't contribute to the bottom line, and it wasn't possible for them to evaluate her performance in that particular year. I think your expectations for maternity leave are a little skewed. I highly doubt there would any legislation against what the company did. They've met all their obligations. If she likes her job and there's future for potential career growth within it, you may want to leave it be. Can't see a company looking to kindly at that considering they just covered her mat leave. You'd probably have a case if there was another person in similar circumstances who got race. But if not, why rock the boat? Last edited by MJM; 08-28-2010 at 02:01 PM.