View Single Post
Old 08-26-2010, 11:15 AM   #52
WilsonFourTwo
First Line Centre
 
WilsonFourTwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calgary.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam View Post
1) Norway has such a large fund because they have many state-owned companies.

2) We need to work on your definition of risk.

This is political suicide.

We already have Petro-Canada. Look how that turned out.
Holy crap.......ALBERTA IS NOT NORWAY. Norway is an example of what a sovereign fund can do if properly managed. It was offered to provide support to the suggestion that the Heritage Fund has not been managed properly for decades.

As for my "...definition of risk", whatever. That comment is about as foolish as Clinton needing a definition for "Is".

Last edited by WilsonFourTwo; 08-26-2010 at 11:17 AM. Reason: Slightly harsh word used when referring to foolishness.
WilsonFourTwo is offline   Reply With Quote