Quote:
Originally Posted by puckluck
How do you guys feel about having 3 teams? winner goes on? I think it would give us more time to create chemistry between the players on our teams. Last week was kind of tough because you never really got to play with the same players. So probably 3 teams with one or two subs each.
Just a thought.
|
I see the benefits... but then teams could be stuck waiting for 30-45 minutes for a winner.
On Monday we played 4 games in about 3 hours, meaning each game last 45 minutes on average.
With 5 subs, you're stuck waiting to play for 10 minutes maximum I bet when you're the last in line to sub on.
We could run it by everybody, but personally, I think it's just better to have 2 large teams.