Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesPuck12
I think that's a bad idea. What if, the first player is slightly better than the second, and wins the first game. The worse player will have a slight advantage to get to 1-1. I'd say we random all 3 maps from the 2v2 map pool.
|
Exactly. Makes things more interesting. And if it does get to 1-1 the better player has the opportunity to play on their map of choice for game 3.
So you do something like Metalopolis (a map that is widely considered the most balanced) for the first map, loser picks second, loser picks third (if necessary). That's how most of the big tournaments operate.