Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeBass
My question was did the message lose its mark by the distribution of that message.
|
Yup.
Quote:
|
It appears you answered with your opinion, bravo. I also stated the impact remains to be seen as the news cycle works it.
|
It'll be on the cover of the Sun, page 2 story in the Herald, then forgotten.
Quote:
|
Greenpeace has created a brand that brings awareness wether we like it or not. It appears you do not agree but we are now on page 9.
|
It appears your reading comprehension is weak as I have never argued against that point. Obviously Greenpeace has created a brand that brings awareness... of Greenpeace. I was already well aware of this group of lunatics. Their sad little stunt taught me nothing I didn't already know about them.
Quote:
|
I do not agree that the messenger and message is the same here but that is your opinion.
|
Indeed it is, and I would argue it is a majority opinion.
Quote:
|
I would guess that your awareness of the Human Society would be less if it was not for PETA and Greenpeace. Sometimes you just have to shout to be heard.
|
Actually, it would be greater if not for PETA, and I have no clue what relevance Greenpeace has to the Humane Society. I would suggest that reasonable organizations struggle to be heard when unreasonable ones shout unnecessarily. More, I would suggest that such needless shouting brings a cause into disrepute and only hurts decent organizations.