Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
I know it's easy to say "Oh that's wikipedia!!!!" but there are many supporting documents in there. All it says is there is the potential for this and that, but that nothing is conclusive. So basically they are really looking as hard as they can in this day and age of fantastic resources and technology, and nothing is confirmed, even in long term users.
|
Good, then tax it and put the money towards research. Prove to me that its outright safe and non effective and then you can lower the tax on it. Remember in the 50's Cigarettes were safe, everyone did it, hell doctors recommended that pregnant woman have a couple of smokes a day to combat anxiety.
To me, with the smokers, your inhaling stuff into your lungs thats not meant to be there. Your altering brain chemistry every time you use it.
But at the very least you treat it like any other legal vice.