Quote:
Originally Posted by Beerfest
You're your arguament is invalid because you have no facts to back up what you're saying. You're reaching to defend a cop.
|
Again, straw man fallacy.
What I've been saying is that there is not enough evidence to judge. I've provided alternative scenarios of the event (which you are continuing to judge without any audio!), which I've prefaced using the words "if". I'm going to guess Beerfest, that you don't work in a profession which actually performs investigations, because assuming certain facts and reaching conclusions prior to attaining all the information is not a correct thing to do.
Throughout this thread you've demonstrated:
a) an overall distrust of authority
b) assumptions of fact (assuming conversations prior to the incident without base)
c) assumptions of outcomes (if she said this, the police
must do this)
This incident isn't nearly as cut and dry as you're trying to make it out to be.