Quote:
Originally Posted by killer_carlson
It's interesting that police are involved, because they have a good angle on this one in respect of the alleged nude photos. Anyone who looked at them and that can be proven has then looked at child porn. That's a hell of a stigma and a slam dunk conviction. I imagine there are some computer whiz folks at the FBI or that Bill Gates funded policing agency who will be all over this because of the notoriety.
|
It's pretty hard to prove that somebody was looking at child porn. Having images stored in your temp folder is not concrete evidence, as for all anyone knows you were just harmlessly browsing 4chan where anyone can post anything. Besides, there's no way to prove that anyone looking at these photos knew she was under 18.
When it comes to child porn there's no room for grey areas, it's a very serious charge. Typically the ones who get busted are the ones uploading it or the ones who have collections permanently stored on their computers. Probably nothing will come of this, especially since there were thousands and thousands of people who saw the photos.