I saw McIver on CFCN last night with his quote for a 250m tunnel, instead of the longer 600m version. My question is how can 250m be enough?
The new runway will be at least 60m wide, plus spacing on at least one side (probably two) before a standard size taxiway, leaving space on either side of all of this for safety reasons can this tunnel really only be done at 250m? Or is this just another grandstanding show by McIver to make people think we could get it for cheaper?
|