Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
It's fairly simple. If a woman says to me "I am deeply religious and will only have sex with a fellow Scientologist so as not to condemn my soul to eternal damnation", and I reply with "you are in luck for I learned all I needed to know at the knee of L. Ron Hubbard", I think this deception is material and serious enough where I can see this being deemed "sexual assault".
Recall the fellow in Pennsylvania who was charged after getting sex by pretending to be Roethlisberger - what was he actually charged with (I cannot remember)?
Now, this case certainly doesn't seem to be that serious, and either we are lacking some material facts or we have a judge who takes race/religion very seriously....
|
According to the news reports I can find the charges were due to money he obtained based on his impersonation, so it was a theft issue. I don't know of any instance where lying about identity (as opposed to having STD's) to obtain sex has ever been found to be a crime by a US or Canadian court. Hopefully not an Australian one either, as I was a locked out NHL player living in Sydney on certain evenings in 2005
