Quote:
Originally Posted by OilKiller
Sure, but anyway you slice it, it's still Bell. No thanks. Bell sucks.
|
Such well thought out reasoning, how can anyone argue with that?
Shaw is also a big ugly hag of a company, what is your point? Is Shaw really giving that much back to Calgary in comparison to someone like Westjet? They are ultra successful and really are not involved enough in their local community to induce blind faith.
IMHO BellTV is a better product, I have had both. Receivers are better, picture quality is better, those wild HD feeds during the Olympics were amazing, 3D content without the limitation of stomping other existing services - BellTV is a television provider - Shaw is attempting to be too many things on a limited amount of available bandwidth.
Is Shaw running fibre to the house yet? That will be the only way to deliver the digital media demands of the future.