GTF, you fail again. And using Ad Hominem attacks to deflect attention from your hypocrisy only serves to dig yourself deeper in that holier-than-thou hole you're digging.
Your arguments now carry as much weight as a newborn.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
He's not taking responsibility. If he was, he wouldn't be bringing up the fact that he was 24, implying that 24 year olds are not capable of controlling their behaviour thus part of the reason for his adultery was that he was too young to know better.
|
Yes, he has taken responsibility. If he
HADN'T taken responsibility, he would be implying that being 24 should absolve him of any wrong-doing because he didn't know any better. His whole 'I was 24' argument is not an excuse, it's a reason. An answer to the question 'why?' But at no point in his explanation did he attempt to escape consequence. THAT is the difference between taking responsibility, and avoiding it.