Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
That report card was a joke. 70% of your score is awarded for being against taxes and for cutting spending. Whether or not that would send the city straight into the crapper was irrelevant. The report operates on the assumption that all spending is bad spending, all taxes are bad taxes. That's a piss-poor assumption. That's why McIver get an A+ and Bronco gets a D, but intersections and LRT expansions cost money and I'm glad Bronco was willing to build them.
Whole report card here:
http://www.boma.ca/2009CouncilReportCard.pdf |
If that list just published which alderman voted for which issue I think it would have been a pretty good exercise. Just putting them all together without giving any information on who voted for what is just useless.