I wonder if this was their stream of logic:
Step 1: Wanting to bring light to the fact that there are many countries in the world that could use some financial aid. While we're trying to save the world, we should also look at, well, saving the world, try to raise more awareness to saving the environment.
Step 2: Gather a bunch of protestors.
Step 3: Violently attack the city of Toronto, destroying several stores, endangering innocent people and basically shutting down a large part of the city.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: You piss off a bunch of people, no one listens to your message because of the way you portrayed yourselves as violent civil terrorists. Not to mention the whole save the world thing doesn't work when people need to spend money to fix the problems you have created through your vandalism and violence, and more resources are needed from our environment to reconstruct things you have destroyed.
Their version of saving the world would be like someone protesting the Nazi's during WWII while also blaming all their problems on the Jewish.
|