I stand by my opinion. If the government is involved in any way, then yes they should be allowed to be married.
It seems like the people against it are up in arms because the term "marriage" is used instead of something like "civil union". In that case, change everything to civil union, and let the religious people have their word back. At the end of the day, if that's the only reason to be against it, then it's just petty semantics IMO.
But like I've said all along. I have a nagging suspicion that people against gay "marriage" are only hiding behind this semantics argument as a way to oppose gay marriage without sounding discriminatory.
|