Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I wanted to debate this on two points.
I don't feel that violent offenders and sexual offenders should even be eligible for pardon's. These are people that have been willing to commit repugnent and dangerous acts, they represent a threat to society. Their actions should never be removed from public record. the police should always be aware of where these people are. I have no problems with non violent offenders getting pardons.
Isn't accepting responsibility for your actions a big part of rehabilitation? If thats the case then Karla Homolka isn't rehabilitated, she merely served time. She's never been upfront about her role in the rape and murders of those girls and the rape and murder of her sister.
Lets look at Karla's chain of event.
She played up the battered wife defense, even though it became clear that this wasn't the case.
She conspired with her lawyer and her husband to hide incrimminating evidence including video tapes that not only showed her participating in these crimes, but enjoying her role.
She engaged in a jail house relationship with a violent male offender, and upon her release continued to pursue that relationship.
Even in her interview she was more concerned with the effects of the crimes on herelf and her lifestyle then being really sorry about what she did.
She continued a sexual relationship with a female inmate because she managed to con the inmate into buying her clothes and a computer.
She has manipulated people and manipulated the system through the entire event, she willingly participated in violent crimes, and she's in no way sorry.
There shouldn't even be a hearing, but my guess is that her pardon will be rubberstamped.
|
Come on Captain....the worst of the WORST was the FIRST.....
She offered up her little sister to a sadistic pedophilic-rapist and covered it up with that sadistic pedophilic-rapist.
The one and ONLY evidence that I believe from her husband was that SHE did the killings. He wasn't a killer. She was.