Quote:
Originally Posted by octothorp
Does the credibility of an organization like the IPCC not depend on it's science? If you think that the science here is fine (which the paper supports), but you say that the reputation of the IPCC is in tatters, I'm puzzled as to what you see in this paper as the smoking gun.
|
Do I REALLY need to repeat this talk again? Or should I link to the Climategate thread? Honestly, IPCC credibility depends on it being credible.
It is NOT.
The IPCC's biggest, oldest, AND LAST bugbear is that their was unanimity amongst climate researchers. Now we have it from the horses mouth that is simply untrue.