Quote:
Originally Posted by HOZ
I said NOTHING about the science one way or the other right in my first post. I did say the so called scientific consensus on AGW trumpeted by many is bogus and the credibility of the IPCC is in tatters.
So.....where have I said the science is wrong in this thread? |
Does the credibility of an organization like the IPCC not depend on it's science? If you think that the science here is fine (which the paper supports), but you say that the reputation of the IPCC is in tatters, I'm puzzled as to what you see in this paper as the smoking gun.