View Single Post
Old 06-09-2010, 01:40 PM   #30
automaton 3
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft View Post
Are our CF-18s really SO outdated for the military that we need to order upwards of 65 JSFs? Aren't there aspects of the military that could use that money a lot more?
The remaining jets just completed a major update and in systems and weapons terms are in really good shape. The helmet mounted cueing system in particular is a huge leap forward. The Norad commander recently commented that the Canadian jets are some of the most advanced he has in inventory other than the F-22's.

However in terms of airframe life, these are getting to be very tired jets. We performed a centre barrel replacement in some of our jets at great time and expense which gives them a little more life, but with the airframe stresses that a combat jet is subjected to they have definite service lives which is fast approaching.

As for the JSF, I am not sold at all. These are very much "paper" jets still.

There are enormous cost overruns and the test program is far, far behind. The performance numbers we've seen so far are not impressive. It is overweight. The software code to fly the jet is still in its infancy, let alone the coding for the sensors and weapons systems. It is somewhat stealthy from the front aspect only, no where close to an F-22 overall. All of the other international partners are putting on the brakes for these reasons (the spiraling cost one of the biggest factors).

A competition is by far the preferable route to replace the 18's in my humble opinion. The Eurofighter, the Gripen NG and the Super Hornets with the coming uprated engines look like they might be quite competitive.
automaton 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to automaton 3 For This Useful Post: