View Single Post
Old 06-09-2010, 12:58 PM   #37
mykalberta
Franchise Player
 
mykalberta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403 View Post
I don't see why Calgary would need/want to co-host with Edmonton. What would Edmonton bring to the table that Calgary can't provide? I guess it could encourage more political support, and thereby more funding, but outside of that there's really no point. If it came down to requiring joint hosting in order to get funding I'd say that the bid was rather weak to begin with.
I think Calgary alone getting it a second time isnt likely unless no one actually wants it other than Calgary.

A combo pick reduces the cost of facilities and would give the reason for a high speed rail, the IOC is like any other big international organization, big supporter of green tech and legacy type things. What is better legacy than a high speed rail between to oil cities in evil oil sands alberta.
__________________
MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona
Rudy was the only hope in 08
2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34%
mykalberta is offline   Reply With Quote