Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
This isn't an alienation of affections claim, the claim doesn't even exist in Ontario, so none of this would be at issue here.
|
I think it is somewhat an alienation of affection claim disguised as an invasion of privacy/breach of contract claim. How else can she justify $600,000.00 in damages? She is blaming Rogers for the break-up of her marriage.
In a statement of defence, Rogers denies it terminated the contract and says the company "cannot be held responsible for the condition of the marriage, for the plaintiff's affair and consequential marriage break-up, nor the effects the break-up has had on her.