Quote:
Originally Posted by Regorium
Do you really believe what you just said is an accurate hyperbolic portrayal of what actually happened in this case?
I'm going to save you the shame of picking one line in a post out of context and actually respond to you rather than dropping a one liner of my own.
If you knew my full name, my address, my postal code, my birthday, my mother's maiden name, my kindergarten, you could obtain my voicemail password too. All of these things would probably be known by a husband or wife. What's Rogers going to do if you answer all of the identification questions right?
I also gave an example and there have been several in this thread, where a person that isn't the account holder has made minor changes to the account without major issue. Again, I don't think it is unreasonable in a husband/wife situation for an account change like this (consolidation of bills for extra discounts) to be made with the authorization of only one member of the household.
|
The cell account was held personally, it's not a household item to be bundled. Just because the bills goes to the same address doesn't mean that Rogers is justified in bundling them, and the information they contain, together.