Quote:
Originally Posted by Smelly Fred
I see whan I am accused of avoiding questions it is wrong and I must be held to account by you. When you do so you are justified because the person debating you is just digging for ammunition.
|
I'm not holding you to account, I'm choosing to do unto you as you have done unto me.
If you aren't digging for ammunition, how else do you explain ignoring questions and statements and selectively choosing what to reply to and what to ignore?
Honestly, I am curious, because I myself am pretty much incapable of doing that unless I make a significant effort.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smelly Fred
Write the rules to suit yourself often do you? Like to stack the deck perhaps?
|
Obviously not, because I've replied completely and comprehensively to everything you've posted to me for many pages, and am only now deciding what to respond to in response to pages of having questions and points ignored. Plus I'm being completely open and transparent about why I'm doing it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smelly Fred
It would seem I must pass some integrity litmus test by you in order to receive an answer. I didn't read the rule bopok before I logged on. I'm sorry but I missed that meeting. Could you forward the minutes so I can catch up?
|
Again obviously incorrect, because again I've replied completely and comprehensively, treating you the same as I would treat anyone else, until the number of unanswered questions and points got to the point that I had to question if you were really interested in an honest discussion.
If you honestly want someone to answer your questions, you should do unto them and answer theirs.