I love Rogers' response:
Quote:
In a statement of defence, Rogers denies it terminated the contract and says the company "cannot be held responsible for the condition of the marriage, for the plaintiff's affair and consequential marriage break-up, nor the effects the break-up has had on her.
“Rogers is not the cause of these. The marriage break-up and its effects happened, or alternatively would in any event have happened, regardless of the form in which the plaintiff and her husband received their invoices for Rogers services in July 2007.”
|
Basically saying "you dumb whore, you would have been caught anyways, it's not our fault you're a tramp who can't remain faithful"
I bet her ex husband is a Rogers customer for life now - they probably saved him THOUSANDS down the road as this would not have been the only affair she would have been involved in.