Quote:
Originally posted by transplant99@Sep 21 2005, 08:21 PM
OK>...everyone arguing that "global warming" is somehow responsible for the giant increase in hurricanes this year...please explain to me one thing.
That being....if THE 2 (TWO) foremost experts in North American hurricanes over the last 60 years BOTH agree that this is nothing more than a cyclical occurrence with variables that haven't all come togther at one time before (like it is this season) then what in the hell is the continuous argument against THEM??
These guys aren't just some fly by night, "im making a name for myself by being different", Dr. Quacks. These guys have devoted the majority of their lives and even more time to the science and reseach of hurricanes current as well as past...they conclusively and undeniably agree that this season is nothing more than....a normal cycle of things predicted and seen before.
Yet...and argument continues because of some other scienctists that DONT do this full time, nor as their particular study, and that becomes the gospel for the tree hugging crowd?
Come on.
As has been proven by HISTORY, and SCIENCE....this is not theory nor subjectivity....its freaking fact and a half. Deal with it. The people in the gulf coast are.
|
Fair enough. I don't know anything about hurricanes and global warming so I'll agree with that.
I assume though that you agree with the tree-hugger theory of "global warming" then, and the Kyoto science, and the IPCC et cetera? After all, all those scientists that speak of the dire consequences of global warming and the causes of it aren't "making a name for myself/fly-by-night/Dr.Quacks" and they have devoted the majority of lives to studying and researching climate change and conclusively and undeniably agree about it and are foremost experts on the subject.
If mean if two experts agree on this hurricane cycle thing, and they are well respected and all that so that means they are right, then thousands of well-respected and peer-reviewed experts that agree on a tree-huggers definition of global warming must be correct. Right?