View Single Post
Old 03-26-2010, 10:12 AM   #55
Regorium
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fredr123 View Post
I'm not sure how that article backs up your first statement. It has to do with dads who unwittingly parent children that they are genetically not related to and how the use of DNA testing has started to be accepted by the courts to terminate those parental obligations.
I understand that this is a small portion of divorce law and what happens in those cases. However, I was using it as an example of the fact that there is legislated injustice against men, however specific it may be.

On the other hand, I think you will be hard pressed to find laws that basically screw women over in the divorce court and perpetuate an injustice. Especially one that has been brought to surface with hard evidence detailing the exact happenings of the situation. (ie. no examples of dead beat dads that have tons of money in someone else's name and hid money or whatnot)

Also, I will preface by saying that I am not a parent at the moment, and I don't know whether or not my thoughts will change when I am. I feel that thinking about this from the child's perspective is not justice. The father is the one that has been screwed for 10-18 years, and it is the mother's fault for being a whore. The mother should shoulder the responsibility (financial and otherwise) for her actions, but the law courts have decided that the duped man should be the one responsible for the mother's actions. This is regardless of how the child feels. Should the child feel like the dad abandoned them, maybe they should point the blame where it correctly belongs: the mother.
Regorium is offline   Reply With Quote