Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanna Sniper
Quick Question
I've been out of the wrestling world since the Hart injury, I stopped watching WWF when he went to WCW and stopped watching wrestling all together once he retired. For kicks I tuned in once word spread that Bret signed a short term contract. So this is pretty much all new people since the days when I watched
My question is with the Triple H vs. Sheamus,
Normally you would think a new guy like Sheamus being a heel would beat down on HHH for 12 minutes to make himself look decent and gain some reputation then have HHH pull out a victory out of nowhere so everyone wins... fans happy, HHH wins, Sheamus gains some respect
But I really don't see HHH as a solid wrestler that can make another wrestler look good, looks like crap when he wrestles and is a gimmicky like Hogan with 3 or 4 moves that don't even look good.
This is the reason I picked Sheamus, as i don't see any other way coming out of this match that he gets any push other then getting the victory.
Am I wrong about HHH, I've always though he was a "business" wrestler first and does whats best for the company but when I see him wrestle I find it hard to believe. Can Sheamus walk away from this with a lose without being thrown to the wolves and pushed aside?
|
IMO Sheamus puts up a fight and HHH wins in the end. He's still McMahon family and the top dog in the business right now (sorry Cena). Sheamus continues to be a main event player, no idea why. He's a pasty freaking ginger that has the mic skills of Corky, but he's big so he continues getting his push. HHH isn't losing to that scrub at WM.